AIGovernrAIGovernrDocs
Ctrl K
Open workspace
Getting started
AIGovernr documentationQuickstartNavigating the appCore conceptsHow everything connects
Workspaces
CompaniesProjectsTeams & responsibilitiesDashboards & assignments
Account & administration
Plans & billingAccess control & rolesAccount securityNotifications
AI systems
AI SystemsRegister an AI SystemAI System classificationAI System Governance planGovernance plan vs PlaybookSystem documentation & testing recordsVendors & dependenciesShadow AI & asset graph
Obligations
Frameworks & obligationsRequirements & tasksGovernance knowledgeRegulatory updates
Assurance
Assure overviewControlsAssurance methodsTechnical evaluationsDPIAEvidence managementISO/IEC 42001 readinessGovernance maturity
Issues & actions
Findings vs risksCorrective actions
Decisions
ApprovalsApproval PoliciesDecision LedgerExceptions & reassessment
Continuous governance
MonitoringIncidentsAgent & MCP governance
Reusable governance
AI governance policiesPolicy templatesPlaybooks
Reporting
Reports, certificates & audit export
Client collaboration
Client portal & engagement
Guides
Run a client governance engagementOperate an AI governance programmeFramework implementation guides
Discovery tools
Website Compliance Scanner
AI assistance
AI Assistant
Developers
Integrations & APIs
Help
Troubleshooting & FAQ
DocsIssues & actions
Issues & actions

Findings vs risks

A Finding records an observed deficiency. A Risk describes a possible harmful outcome. Link them, but keep them separate.

In the app
Project → Identify & Remediate → Findings and Risks

Findings

Example: two sampled decisions were made without the required human review.

  • Create one with New Finding, import critical and high results with Import from Compliance Scan, or let a failed control test or evaluation raise one.
  • Severity is Critical, High, Medium or Low. A reviewer can reclassify severity with a rationale.
  • Status moves through Open, In review, In remediation, Resolved, Accepted risk and Closed. A finding can be resolved only once it has notes, evidence or a corrective action.
  • Record the management response (Pending, Accepted, Challenged or Withdrawn) and use Create remediation to start a corrective action.

Risks

Example: unreliable human oversight may lead to inappropriate clinical decisions.

  • The Risk Register scores each risk as likelihood × impact on 1–5 scales: 20 or more is Critical, 15 or more High, 8 or more Medium, otherwise Low. Risk Heatmap shows the spread.
  • Record the mitigation and the residual likelihood and impact after it.
  • Status is Open, Mitigating, Mitigated or Accepted Risk.
  • Accept risk requires a justification and a future review date. To have the acceptance approved formally, use Request approval with the action Accept residual risk.

Last reviewed 2 October 2026

Next stepCorrective actionsA corrective action is the remediation plan that fixes a Finding. It closes only once the fix has been verified.
Governance maturityCorrective actions
On this page
FindingsRisks
Capability status

Check current availability and limitations before relying on a feature.

View matrix